When pressed on the Texas law by a reporter, he noted he supports exceptions in cases of rape and incest - exceptions notably not included in the new law - in addition to instances in which the patient’s life is in danger. “I’m pro-life,” said Republican Glenn Youngkin, a candidate for governor in increasingly Democratic Virginia, where the only open governor’s race in the nation is coming up in November, The Associated Press reported. Some Republicans were more muted in their support, partly because some GOP leaders support more exceptions than are in the Texas law. Lyft also said it is donating $1 million to Planned Parenthood to fight the law and “to ensure that transportation is never a barrier to healthcare access.”įollowing the Supreme Court’s decision to leave the pro-life TX law in place, I have directed the Unborn Child Advocate in my office to immediately review the new TX law and current South Dakota laws to make sure we have the strongest pro life laws on the books in SD.- Governor Kristi Noem September 2, 2021 Both are completely unacceptable,” Lyft said in a statement. Imagine being a pregnant woman trying to get to a healthcare appointment and not knowing if your driver will cancel on you for fear of breaking a law. Imagine being a driver and not knowing if you are breaking the law by giving someone a ride. “Drivers are never responsible for monitoring where their riders go or why. As a result, both Lyft and Uber announced Friday that they’re creating legal defense funds to cover costs for any driver sued under the law. “Decisions like this one chip away at our democracy.”Ĭoncerns also are being voiced that people with any connection to someone having a procedure that runs afoul of the law - including ride-share drivers who transport them - could be prosecuted. “Because the Court has now shown repressive state legislatures how to game the system, the House Judiciary Committee will hold hearings to shine a light on the Supreme Court’s dangerous and cowardly use of the shadow docket,” Nadler said. and chair of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement Thursday that the House will hold additional hearings. In February, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the court’s “shadow docket,” calling in a number of law experts to discuss the procedural calendar. “Today’s ruling illustrates just how far the Court’s ‘shadow-docket’ decisions may depart from the usual principles of appellate process.” “Without full briefing or argument, and after less than 72 hours’ thought, this Court greenlights the operation of Texas’s patently unconstitutional law banning most abortions,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissent. The law includes an exception if the life of the patient is in danger, but not for rape or incest. The Texas law bans abortions as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, before many people are aware they are pregnant. The unsigned, one-paragraph court order said that while the appeal raises serious questions about the constitutionality of the Texas law, the case just wasn’t strong enough for the court to grant an injunction. In the meeting, National Women’s Law Center President Fatima Goss Graves called it “a legal and public health emergency.” If permitted to proceed, this law will be precedent-setting and could normalize vigilante interference in the patient-physician relationship in other complex, controversial medical or ethical situations.”Įarlier Friday, White House officials held a roundtable with national women’s rights and reproductive health leaders over coordinating their response to the Texas law. The group echoed Biden’s vigilante remark that the law “allows for a bounty that encourages practically any citizen to file a cause of action against physicians, other health care professionals, and anyone who ‘aids or abets,’ based on a suspicion. Supreme Court so far has not stopped the provisions of SB 8 that create a scheme of deputizing private citizens to carry out what the state itself cannot do, due to U.S. Yet, that day has sadly arrived in the state we love,” the group said in its statement. “The physicians of Texas never thought the day would come when the performance of our oath would create a private cause of action for persons not connected to or harmed by the action.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |